Received: from relay6.UU.NET (relay6.UU.NET [192.48.96.16]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id OAA10756 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Thu, 21 Dec 1995 14:56:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay6.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzvcp18726; Thu, 21 Dec 1995 14:50:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA24579; Thu, 21 Dec 1995 14:50:39 -0500
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 1995 14:50:39 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <9512211123.ZM13143@war.agames.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: "Bob Ingold" <ingold@agames.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: DPaint replacements -- must animate +save IFF
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
I am just now using Animator Studio which is an animation editing package.
Although you can't really playback a large sized screen in realtime, it's a
great compliment to Photoshop. I think both packages together equal Dpaint.
What I really like about it is it's smart enough to know that when you load a
single image, it will autoload the whole sequence. The same happens when
saving. It will save as AVI and supports sound.
Adobe Photoshop is an indispensible tool in this and many other
> >situations. No animator should be without it. It is rather expensive, but
> >worth every penny.
>
> Since PS does NOT animate (nor even batch, what the HELL is with that?)
> it is hardly a replacement for DPaint IV, which makes creating animated clip
